Select and specify
Establish construction, diameter, grade, core, lay, minimum breaking force, reeving, drum and sheave compatibility.
Select the right rope, inspect its condition and make a documented replacement decision using the appropriate guide or preliminary tool.

Quick answer
Crane wire rope decisions should combine correct selection, routine inspection, discard criteria, diameter checks, corrosion review, broken-wire assessment and internal inspection when needed. Replacement should be based on condition and applicable standards, not only calendar age.
Establish construction, diameter, grade, core, lay, minimum breaking force, reeving, drum and sheave compatibility.
Check visible defects, measure diameter, examine terminations and high-wear zones, and retain comparable records.
Compare findings with applicable criteria, rope history and competent-person judgement; retain, monitor or replace.
A rope is not defined by diameter alone. Confirm the crane and hoist manufacturer's requirements, reeving arrangement, rope construction, grade, core, lay direction, minimum breaking force, end terminations, operating environment and compatibility with the drum and sheaves.
Run a preliminary breaking-load and safety-factor check. It does not replace manufacturer selection or design verification.
Compare construction, grade, certificate data, lubrication, drum/sheave fit, terminations, traceability and supplier scope.
Begin here for inspection scope, rejection conditions, high-risk zones, records and the relationship to ISO 4309.
Understand how rope construction, broken-wire location, reference length and other deterioration affect assessment.
Assess distribution, clustering, breaks near terminations and why a single universal wire-count limit is unsafe.
Measure across strand crowns, use consistent locations and compare trends with the new-rope baseline.
Recognize external and possible internal corrosion, loss of metallic area, dry rope and lubricant contamination.
Identify permanent deformation, strand displacement, crushing, waviness and likely rope-system causes.
Learn when magnetic rope testing adds value for internal flaws or loss of metallic area that visual checks may miss.
Replace by condition and applicable criteria, not an arbitrary calendar interval; account for duty and environment.
| Observation | Immediate response | Next evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Broken or clustered wires | Restrict use if condition may be unsafe and arrange competent assessment. | Location, number, reference length, rope construction and applicable discard criteria. |
| Kink, birdcage, crushed or displaced strands | Do not straighten and return to service without assessment. | Inspect fleet angle, drum winding, sheaves, shock loading and installation history. |
| Diameter loss or flattened section | Measure consistently at multiple points and compare with baseline. | Wear, core deterioration, crushing, corrosion and manufacturer limits. |
| Corrosion or suspected internal damage | Clean only as permitted, inspect closely and consider specialist examination. | Environment, lubrication history, MRT findings and loss of metallic area. |
| No visible damage but high consequence or uncertain history | Increase evidence rather than assuming appearance equals condition. | Records, operating cycles, competent examination and NDT/MRT where justified. |
Separate supply, inspection and installation capability when shortlisting. A seller of rope is not automatically qualified to inspect a crane rope system or install and commission the replacement.