What the pack contains
Five files for the full RFQ-to-handover decision path
The value is not the spreadsheet format. The value is that every supplier is forced into the same decision structure: requirement, quotation basis, vendor capability, acceptance and document closure.
1. EOT Crane RFQ Sheet
Define capacity, span, lift, duty, speeds, controls, power supply, safety devices, installation scope, testing, warranty and commercial exclusions.
- Use before asking for price.
- Ask every bidder to respond against the same fields.
- Reduces silent assumptions and vague scope.
2. Vendor Evaluation Scorecard
Score technical fit, commercial scope, documentation, references, service capability, response quality and acceptance readiness.
- Weighted decision aid for procurement teams.
- Useful when trust and price are the only current filters.
- Creates a defensible shortlist discussion.
3. Quotation Comparison Sheet
Normalize multiple supplier quotations before selecting the lowest number. Compare scope, component makes, taxes, freight, installation, testing and warranty.
- Designed for Supplier A/B/C comparison.
- Highlights missing scope and cost adjustments.
- Works with the full quote-comparison guide.
4. FAT/SAT Acceptance Checklist
Check factory acceptance, dispatch readiness, site acceptance, safety devices, load testing, commissioning, punch-list closure and final sign-off.
- Use before dispatch and final payment.
- Helps avoid acceptance confusion at site.
- Separates inspection evidence from verbal claims.
5. Handover-Document Checklist
Track drawings, design basis, wheel loads, electrical diagrams, BOM, manuals, certificates, FAT/SAT reports, load-test records, warranty and training records.
- Useful for maintenance teams after commissioning.
- Prevents missing documents becoming a future breakdown problem.
- Can be tied to payment milestones.
Important technical boundary
This pack is a buyer-side procurement aid. It is not crane design certification, statutory approval, supplier endorsement or a substitute for qualified engineering review.
- Use it to ask better questions.
- Use vendor data and applicable standards for final decisions.
- Keep project-specific engineering approval separate.